tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1539224043542073549.post684245487599000512..comments2023-10-09T16:34:51.119+01:00Comments on Lovell Blogs...: Paying for Online Content...Mark Lovellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15280752157572859496noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1539224043542073549.post-51590854750962185412009-11-10T08:18:46.935+00:002009-11-10T08:18:46.935+00:00Thanks for commenting Maddie - I agree though...an...Thanks for commenting Maddie - I agree though...and there's still a role to play for television news which people would probably use as well if newspapers go bust because they already pay their licence fees...until the internet takes over that as well!Mark Lovellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15280752157572859496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1539224043542073549.post-359855808309401642009-11-09T23:40:23.860+00:002009-11-09T23:40:23.860+00:00Interesting.. I think students like you and me (re...Interesting.. I think students like you and me (read journalism students), and the public today reading newspapers like the independent, the times, guardian etc. could consider paying for 'professional' news as we know the opposite side - the 'acne-boy' kinda news. I'm not sure whehter the group reading red tops would consider paying though - like you said, people are already upset about paying internet connections fees etc, and this is a bit dangerous. Even though this group of society mostly get their news from less reliable sources they do still read news and keep themselves up to date with what's going on in the society. If newspapers were to only be online based in the future with an online-fee to read, I think part of the society, that is already considered 'low-market' would be affected the worst..<br /><br />Look at me rambling on.. Just general thoughts. Like I said, interesting!<br /><br />Maddie<br />http://madeleineklippel.blogspot.comMadeleine Klippelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11371289849724685232noreply@blogger.com